Short answer: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 3.7x cheaper (0.099¢ vs 0.36¢ a chat). Qwen 3.8 Max ranks higher overall (#3 vs #8). Qwen 3.8 Max wins at reasoning, coding, maths, writing, agentic tasks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash wins at following instructions. Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for everyday use and Qwen 3.8 Max when quality matters most.


| Qwen 3.8 Max | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per chat (NZD) | 0.36¢ | 0.099¢ |
| Chats per NZ$1 | 275 | 1,009 |
| Overall rank | #3 | #8 |
| Vendor | Alibaba | DeepSeek |
| Speciality | General | General |
| Crowd Elo | 988 | 988 |
| Reasoning | 89 | 85 |
| Code | 82 | 73 |
| Math | 83 | 66 |
| Writing | 84 | 61 |
| Instruction | 80 | 82 |
| Agentic | 97 | 41 |
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 0.099¢ per typical chat versus 0.36¢ for Qwen 3.8 Max on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Qwen 3.8 Max ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Qwen 3.8 Max leads at reasoning, coding, maths, writing, agentic tasks; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads at following instructions.
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
Battle them yourself Qwen 3.8 Max details · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash details