Short answer: Qwen 3.8 Max is 2.5x cheaper (0.36¢ vs 0.91¢ a chat). Qwen 3.8 Max ranks higher overall (#3 vs #6). Qwen 3.8 Max wins at reasoning, coding, maths, writing, agentic tasks. Kimi K3 wins at following instructions. Qwen 3.8 Max is the better all-rounder for the money, but Kimi K3 is worth it if you mostly need following instructions.


| Qwen 3.8 Max | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per chat (NZD) | 0.36¢ | 0.91¢ |
| Chats per NZ$1 | 275 | 109 |
| Overall rank | #3 | #6 |
| Vendor | Alibaba | Moonshot AI |
| Speciality | General | Reasoning |
| Crowd Elo | 988 | no votes |
| Reasoning | 89 | 80 |
| Code | 82 | 80 |
| Math | 83 | 78 |
| Writing | 84 | 70 |
| Instruction | 80 | 84 |
| Agentic | 97 | 69 |
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
Qwen 3.8 Max costs 0.36¢ per typical chat versus 0.91¢ for Kimi K3 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Qwen 3.8 Max ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Qwen 3.8 Max leads at reasoning, coding, maths, writing, agentic tasks; Kimi K3 leads at following instructions.
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.