Short answer: Qwen 3.8 Max is 1.7x cheaper (0.36¢ vs 0.63¢ a chat). Qwen 3.8 Max ranks higher overall (#3 vs #5). Qwen 3.8 Max wins at reasoning, agentic tasks. OpenAI o3 wins at coding. Qwen 3.8 Max is the better all-rounder for the money, but OpenAI o3 is worth it if you mostly need coding.


| Qwen 3.8 Max | OpenAI o3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per chat (NZD) | 0.36¢ | 0.63¢ |
| Chats per NZ$1 | 275 | 159 |
| Overall rank | #3 | #5 |
| Vendor | Alibaba | OpenAI |
| Speciality | General | Math |
| Crowd Elo | 988 | no votes |
| Reasoning | 90 | 73 |
| Code | 80 | 83 |
| Agentic | 97 | 71 |
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
Qwen 3.8 Max costs 0.36¢ per typical chat versus 0.63¢ for OpenAI o3 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Qwen 3.8 Max ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Qwen 3.8 Max leads at reasoning, agentic tasks; OpenAI o3 leads at coding.
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
Battle them yourself Qwen 3.8 Max details · OpenAI o3 details