Short answer: MiMo V2.5 is 20x cheaper (0.018¢ vs 0.36¢ a chat). Qwen 3.8 Max ranks higher overall (#3 vs #10). Qwen 3.8 Max wins at reasoning, coding, agentic tasks. Pick MiMo V2.5 for everyday use and Qwen 3.8 Max when quality matters most.
QQWENGANG
QWEN 3.8 MAX
QWEN GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE742 SOURCES
BUILDAGENTSAUTOMATEIDEAS
CODEAGENTSIDEASINTO REALITY
POWER86AA · CRAPGPT
Agentic
97
Reasoning
90
Code
80
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Value
50
BOSS★★★★
GENERALIST / AGENT
0.36¢ per chat · 275 chats per NZ$1
“Polished. Dangerous. Usually right.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
XXIAOMIGANG
MIMO V2.5
XIAOMI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE722 SOURCES
MOREFORLESS
FASTCHEAPSMART
POWER67AA · CRAPGPT
Writing
90
Instruction
74
Reasoning
73
Code
62
Agentic
55
Value
82
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / WRITER
0.018¢ per chat · 5,549 chats per NZ$1
“Faster than your bottleneck.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Qwen 3.8 Max
MiMo V2.5
Cost per chat (NZD)
0.36¢
0.018¢
Chats per NZ$1
275
5,549
Overall rank
#3
#10
Vendor
Alibaba
Xiaomi
Speciality
General
General
Crowd Elo
988
1000
Reasoning
90
73
Code
80
62
Agentic
97
55
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Qwen 3.8 Max or MiMo V2.5?
MiMo V2.5 costs 0.018¢ per typical chat versus 0.36¢ for Qwen 3.8 Max on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Qwen 3.8 Max or MiMo V2.5?
Qwen 3.8 Max ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Qwen 3.8 Max leads at reasoning, coding, agentic tasks.
Can I try Qwen 3.8 Max and MiMo V2.5 side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
