Short answer: MiMo V2.5 is 123x cheaper (0.018¢ vs 2.22¢ a chat). Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher overall (#1 vs #10). Claude Opus 5.5 wins at reasoning, coding, agentic tasks. Pick MiMo V2.5 for everyday use and Claude Opus 5.5 when quality matters most.
AANTHROPICGANG
CLAUDE OPUS 5.5
ANTHROPIC GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE643 SOURCES
THINKDEEPERWRITECLEANERBUILD SAFER
SAFERIDEASA MOREHUMANTOMORROW
POWER92EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Code
92
Agentic
98
Reasoning
92
Math
91
Writing
90
Value
10
BOSS★★★★★
CODER / AGENT
2.22¢ per chat · 45 chats per NZ$1
“Give me the repo.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
XXIAOMIGANG
MIMO V2.5
XIAOMI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE722 SOURCES
MOREFORLESS
FASTCHEAPSMART
POWER67AA · CRAPGPT
Writing
90
Instruction
74
Reasoning
73
Code
62
Agentic
55
Value
82
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / WRITER
0.018¢ per chat · 5,549 chats per NZ$1
“Faster than your bottleneck.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Claude Opus 5.5
MiMo V2.5
Cost per chat (NZD)
2.22¢
0.018¢
Chats per NZ$1
45
5,549
Overall rank
#1
#10
Vendor
Anthropic
Xiaomi
Speciality
Code
General
Crowd Elo
no votes
1000
Reasoning
92
73
Code
92
62
Agentic
98
55
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or MiMo V2.5?
MiMo V2.5 costs 0.018¢ per typical chat versus 2.22¢ for Claude Opus 5.5 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or MiMo V2.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Claude Opus 5.5 leads at reasoning, coding, agentic tasks.
Can I try Claude Opus 5.5 and MiMo V2.5 side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
