Short answer: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 7.1x cheaper (0.099¢ vs 0.71¢ a chat). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher overall (#8 vs #9). Claude Sonnet 5 wins at writing, agentic tasks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash wins at reasoning, coding, maths, following instructions. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the better all-rounder for the money, but Claude Sonnet 5 is worth it if you mostly need writing, agentic tasks.


| Claude Sonnet 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per chat (NZD) | 0.71¢ | 0.099¢ |
| Chats per NZ$1 | 141 | 1,009 |
| Overall rank | #9 | #8 |
| Vendor | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Speciality | General | General |
| Crowd Elo | no votes | 988 |
| Reasoning | 74 | 85 |
| Code | 70 | 73 |
| Math | 63 | 66 |
| Writing | 72 | 61 |
| Instruction | 75 | 82 |
| Agentic | 69 | 41 |
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 0.099¢ per typical chat versus 0.71¢ for Claude Sonnet 5 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Claude Sonnet 5 leads at writing, agentic tasks; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads at reasoning, coding, maths, following instructions.
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
Battle them yourself Claude Sonnet 5 details · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash details