Short answer: GPT-5.6 Luna is 19x cheaper (0.038¢ vs 0.71¢ a chat). GPT-5.6 Luna ranks higher overall (#11 vs #12). Claude Sonnet 5 wins at reasoning, coding, agentic tasks. GPT-5.6 Luna wins at maths. GPT-5.6 Luna is the better all-rounder for the money, but Claude Sonnet 5 is worth it if you mostly need reasoning, coding, agentic tasks.


| Claude Sonnet 5 | GPT-5.6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per chat (NZD) | 0.71¢ | 0.038¢ |
| Chats per NZ$1 | 141 | 2,638 |
| Overall rank | #12 | #11 |
| Vendor | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Speciality | General | Writing |
| Reasoning | 71 | 66 |
| Code | 68 | 67 |
| Math | 58 | 71 |
| Agentic | 69 | 57 |
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
GPT-5.6 Luna costs 0.038¢ per typical chat versus 0.71¢ for Claude Sonnet 5 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
GPT-5.6 Luna ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Claude Sonnet 5 leads at reasoning, coding, agentic tasks; GPT-5.6 Luna leads at maths.
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
Battle them yourself Claude Sonnet 5 details · GPT-5.6 Luna details