Short answer: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 28x cheaper (under 0.01¢ vs 0.099¢ a chat). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher overall (#8 vs #12). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash wins at reasoning, coding. Ling 3.0 Flash VL wins at agentic tasks. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for everyday use and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when quality matters most.
DDEEPSEEKGANG
DEEPSEEK V4.1 FLASH
DEEPSEEK GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE704 SOURCES
REALTIMEINTELLIGENCEFOR AFASTERTOMORROW
SEEPLANACTFASTER
POWER72ARENA · EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
85
Instruction
82
Code
73
Math
66
Writing
61
Value
66
OPERATOR★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
0.099¢ per chat · 1,009 chats per NZ$1
“Polished. Dangerous. Usually right.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.0 FLASH VL
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE772 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER66AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
75
Agentic
75
Code
55
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Value
98
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
<0.01¢ per chat · 28,300 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Cost per chat (NZD)
0.099¢
under 0.01¢
Chats per NZ$1
1,009
28,300
Overall rank
#8
#12
Vendor
DeepSeek
InclusionAI
Speciality
General
General
Crowd Elo
988
no votes
Reasoning
85
75
Code
73
55
Agentic
41
75
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs under 0.01¢ per typical chat versus 0.099¢ for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads at reasoning, coding; Ling 3.0 Flash VL leads at agentic tasks.
Can I try DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash VL side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
