Short answer: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 132x cheaper (0.099¢ vs 13.05¢ a chat). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher overall (#15 vs #18). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash wins at reasoning, coding. Fugu Ultra v2 wins at maths. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the better all-rounder for the money, but Fugu Ultra v2 is worth it if you mostly need maths.
DDEEPSEEKGANG
DEEPSEEK V4.1 FLASH
DEEPSEEK GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE643 SOURCES
REALTIMEINTELLIGENCEFOR AFASTERTOMORROW
SEEPLANACTFASTER
POWER64EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
84
Code
59
Instruction
54
Math
47
Agentic
41
Value
66
OPERATOR★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
0.099¢ per chat · 1,009 chats per NZ$1
“Polished. Dangerous. Usually right.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
SSAKANAGANG
FUGU ULTRA V2
SAKANA GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE391 SOURCE
SWARMMINDADAPT
MANYMODELSONESCHOOL
POWER59UNVERIFIED · CRAPGPT TESTS
Code
50
Writing
90
Reasoning
56
Instruction
54
Math
52
Value
2
BOSS★★★
CODER / WRITER
13.0¢ per chat · 7 chats per NZ$1
“Ship it. Then fix it.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Fugu Ultra v2
Cost per chat (NZD)
0.099¢
13.05¢
Chats per NZ$1
1,009
7
Overall rank
#15
#18
Vendor
DeepSeek
Sakana AI
Speciality
General
Code
Crowd Elo
988
no votes
Reasoning
84
56
Code
59
50
Math
47
52
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Fugu Ultra v2?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 0.099¢ per typical chat versus 13.05¢ for Fugu Ultra v2 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Fugu Ultra v2?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads at reasoning, coding; Fugu Ultra v2 leads at maths.
Can I try DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2 side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
