Short answer: GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.5x cheaper (0.040¢ vs 0.099¢ a chat). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher overall (#8 vs #10). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash wins at reasoning, coding, maths, writing, following instructions. GLM 5.3 Flash wins at agentic tasks. Pick GLM 5.3 Flash for everyday use and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when quality matters most.


| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per chat (NZD) | 0.099¢ | 0.040¢ |
| Chats per NZ$1 | 1,009 | 2,505 |
| Overall rank | #8 | #10 |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Speciality | General | Reasoning |
| Crowd Elo | 988 | 1012 |
| Reasoning | 85 | 73 |
| Code | 73 | 70 |
| Math | 66 | 52 |
| Writing | 61 | 56 |
| Instruction | 82 | 78 |
| Agentic | 41 | 77 |
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
GLM 5.3 Flash costs 0.040¢ per typical chat versus 0.099¢ for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads at reasoning, coding, maths, writing, following instructions; GLM 5.3 Flash leads at agentic tasks.
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
Battle them yourself DeepSeek V4.1 Flash details · GLM 5.3 Flash details