Short answer: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 3.6x cheaper (under 0.01¢ vs 0.013¢ a chat). Ling 3.0 Flash VL ranks higher overall (#12 vs #16). Ling 3.0 Flash VL wins at reasoning, agentic tasks. GPT-6 Luna wins at coding. Ling 3.0 Flash VL is the better all-rounder for the money, but GPT-6 Luna is worth it if you mostly need coding.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.0 FLASH VL
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE772 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER66AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
75
Agentic
75
Code
55
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Value
98
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
<0.01¢ per chat · 28,300 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
OOPENAIGANG
GPT-6 LUNA
OPENAI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE714 SOURCES
INTELLIGENCEPEOPLETOOLSA BRIGHTERTOMORROW.
BETTERIDEASHIGHERPEOPLE
POWER60ARENA · EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
61
Math
70
Code
67
Instruction
60
Writing
49
Value
90
SPECIALIST★★★
REASONER / ANALYST
0.013¢ per chat · 7,792 chats per NZ$1
“Deep thought. Low drama.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Ling 3.0 Flash VL
GPT-6 Luna
Cost per chat (NZD)
under 0.01¢
0.013¢
Chats per NZ$1
28,300
7,792
Overall rank
#12
#16
Vendor
InclusionAI
OpenAI
Speciality
General
Reasoning
Reasoning
75
61
Code
55
67
Agentic
75
36
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or GPT-6 Luna?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs under 0.01¢ per typical chat versus 0.013¢ for GPT-6 Luna on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or GPT-6 Luna?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Ling 3.0 Flash VL leads at reasoning, agentic tasks; GPT-6 Luna leads at coding.
Can I try Ling 3.0 Flash VL and GPT-6 Luna side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
