Short answer: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 178x cheaper (under 0.01¢ vs 0.63¢ a chat). OpenAI o3 ranks higher overall (#11 vs #12). Ling 3.0 Flash VL wins at reasoning, agentic tasks. OpenAI o3 wins at coding. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for everyday use and OpenAI o3 when quality matters most.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.0 FLASH VL
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE772 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER66AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
75
Agentic
75
Code
55
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Value
98
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
<0.01¢ per chat · 28,300 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
OOPENAIGANG
OPENAI O3
OPENAI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE563 SOURCES
INTELLIGENCEPEOPLETOOLSA BRIGHTERTOMORROW.
BETTERIDEASHIGHERPEOPLE
POWER66ARENA · AA · CRAPGPT
Math
82
Agentic
71
Code
64
Reasoning
61
Instruction
54
Value
38
LIEUTENANT★★★★
ANALYST / AGENT
0.63¢ per chat · 159 chats per NZ$1
“Show your working.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Ling 3.0 Flash VL
OpenAI o3
Cost per chat (NZD)
under 0.01¢
0.63¢
Chats per NZ$1
28,300
159
Overall rank
#12
#11
Vendor
InclusionAI
OpenAI
Speciality
General
Math
Reasoning
75
61
Code
55
64
Agentic
75
71
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or OpenAI o3?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs under 0.01¢ per typical chat versus 0.63¢ for OpenAI o3 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or OpenAI o3?
OpenAI o3 ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Ling 3.0 Flash VL leads at reasoning, agentic tasks; OpenAI o3 leads at coding.
Can I try Ling 3.0 Flash VL and OpenAI o3 side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
