Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Step 3.7 Flash
Short answer: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 95x cheaper (under 0.01¢ vs 0.33¢ a chat). Ling 3.0 Flash VL ranks higher overall (#12 vs #13). Ling 3.0 Flash VL wins at reasoning, coding, agentic tasks. Ling 3.0 Flash VL is the clear pick: stronger and cheaper.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.0 FLASH VL
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT
AI MODEL
REVIEWS
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
GENERALIST / REASONER
<0.01¢ per chat · 28,300 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
SSTEPFUNGANG
STEP 3.7 FLASH
STEPFUN GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT
AI MODEL
REVIEWS
STEPBYSTEP
REASONCLIMBSOLVE
REASONER / EXECUTOR
0.33¢ per chat · 299 chats per NZ$1
“Think deeper. Move carefully.”
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
| Ling 3.0 Flash VL | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|
| Cost per chat (NZD) | under 0.01¢ | 0.33¢ |
| Chats per NZ$1 | 28,300 | 299 |
| Overall rank | #12 | #13 |
| Vendor | InclusionAI | StepFun |
| Speciality | General | Reasoning |
| Reasoning | 75 | 67 |
| Code | 55 | 51 |
| Agentic | 75 | 67 |
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Step 3.7 Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs under 0.01¢ per typical chat versus 0.33¢ for Step 3.7 Flash on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Step 3.7 Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Ling 3.0 Flash VL leads at reasoning, coding, agentic tasks.
Can I try Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Step 3.7 Flash side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
Battle them yourself Ling 3.0 Flash VL details · Step 3.7 Flash details
