Short answer: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 224x cheaper (under 0.01¢ vs 0.79¢ a chat). Grok 4.7 ranks higher overall (#9 vs #13). Grok 4.7 wins at reasoning, coding. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for everyday use and Grok 4.7 when quality matters most.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.0 FLASH VL
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE772 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER66AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
75
Agentic
75
Code
55
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Value
98
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
<0.01¢ per chat · 28,300 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
XXAIGANG
GROK 4.7
XAI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE533 SOURCES
REALQUESTIONS.BOLDERANSWERS.
HIGHERCEILINGS.HARDERPROBLEMS.
POWER68EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
79
Code
69
Writing
54
Math
44
Instruction
4
Value
26
BOSS★★★★
REASONER / CODER
0.79¢ per chat · 126 chats per NZ$1
“See the whole pattern.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Grok 4.7
Cost per chat (NZD)
under 0.01¢
0.79¢
Chats per NZ$1
28,300
126
Overall rank
#13
#9
Vendor
InclusionAI
xAI
Speciality
General
Reasoning
Reasoning
75
79
Code
55
69
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Grok 4.7?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs under 0.01¢ per typical chat versus 0.79¢ for Grok 4.7 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Grok 4.7 leads at reasoning, coding.
Can I try Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Grok 4.7 side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
