Short answer: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.1x cheaper (under 0.01¢ vs 0.018¢ a chat). MiMo V2.5 ranks higher overall (#10 vs #13). Ling 3.0 Flash VL wins at reasoning, agentic tasks. MiMo V2.5 wins at coding. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for everyday use and MiMo V2.5 when quality matters most.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.0 FLASH VL
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE772 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER66AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
75
Agentic
75
Code
55
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Value
98
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
<0.01¢ per chat · 28,300 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
XXIAOMIGANG
MIMO V2.5
XIAOMI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE722 SOURCES
MOREFORLESS
FASTCHEAPSMART
POWER67AA · CRAPGPT
Writing
90
Instruction
74
Reasoning
73
Code
62
Agentic
55
Value
82
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / WRITER
0.018¢ per chat · 5,549 chats per NZ$1
“Faster than your bottleneck.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Ling 3.0 Flash VL
MiMo V2.5
Cost per chat (NZD)
under 0.01¢
0.018¢
Chats per NZ$1
28,300
5,549
Overall rank
#13
#10
Vendor
InclusionAI
Xiaomi
Speciality
General
General
Crowd Elo
no votes
1000
Reasoning
75
73
Code
55
62
Agentic
75
55
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or MiMo V2.5?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs under 0.01¢ per typical chat versus 0.018¢ for MiMo V2.5 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or MiMo V2.5?
MiMo V2.5 ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Ling 3.0 Flash VL leads at reasoning, agentic tasks; MiMo V2.5 leads at coding.
Can I try Ling 3.0 Flash VL and MiMo V2.5 side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
