Short answer: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 11x cheaper (under 0.01¢ vs 0.040¢ a chat). GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher overall (#10 vs #12). Ling 3.0 Flash VL wins at reasoning. GLM 5.3 Flash wins at coding, agentic tasks. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for everyday use and GLM 5.3 Flash when quality matters most.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.0 FLASH VL
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE772 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER66AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
75
Agentic
75
Code
55
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Value
98
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
<0.01¢ per chat · 28,300 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
ZZ.AIGANG
GLM 5.3 FLASH
Z.AI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE714 SOURCES
PRECISECALMAHEAD
REASONATSCALE
POWER68ARENA · EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
73
Instruction
78
Agentic
77
Code
70
Writing
56
Value
78
SPECIALIST★★★★
REASONER / EXECUTOR
0.040¢ per chat · 2,505 chats per NZ$1
“Deep thought. Low drama.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Ling 3.0 Flash VL
GLM 5.3 Flash
Cost per chat (NZD)
under 0.01¢
0.040¢
Chats per NZ$1
28,300
2,505
Overall rank
#12
#10
Vendor
InclusionAI
Z.ai
Speciality
General
Reasoning
Crowd Elo
no votes
1012
Reasoning
75
73
Code
55
70
Agentic
75
77
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or GLM 5.3 Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs under 0.01¢ per typical chat versus 0.040¢ for GLM 5.3 Flash on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Ling 3.0 Flash VL leads at reasoning; GLM 5.3 Flash leads at coding, agentic tasks.
Can I try Ling 3.0 Flash VL and GLM 5.3 Flash side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
