Short answer: Ling 3.1 Flash is 44x cheaper (0.021¢ vs 0.91¢ a chat). Ling 3.1 Flash ranks higher overall (#5 vs #6). Ling 3.1 Flash wins at reasoning. Kimi K3 wins at coding. Ling 3.1 Flash is the better all-rounder for the money, but Kimi K3 is worth it if you mostly need coding.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.1 FLASH
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE832 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER81AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
88
Code
66
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Math
52
Value
86
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
0.021¢ per chat · 4,846 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
MMOONSHOTGANG
KIMI K3
MOONSHOT GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE604 SOURCES
REACHFURTHERTHINKLONGER
LONGCONTEXTDEEPORBIT
POWER78ARENA · EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
80
Instruction
84
Code
80
Math
78
Writing
70
Value
26
BOSS★★★★
REASONER / EXECUTOR
0.91¢ per chat · 109 chats per NZ$1
“Deep thought. Low drama.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Ling 3.1 Flash
Kimi K3
Cost per chat (NZD)
0.021¢
0.91¢
Chats per NZ$1
4,846
109
Overall rank
#5
#6
Vendor
InclusionAI
Moonshot AI
Speciality
General
Reasoning
Reasoning
88
80
Code
66
80
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash or Kimi K3?
Ling 3.1 Flash costs 0.021¢ per typical chat versus 0.91¢ for Kimi K3 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Kimi K3?
Ling 3.1 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Ling 3.1 Flash leads at reasoning; Kimi K3 leads at coding.
Can I try Ling 3.1 Flash and Kimi K3 side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
