Short answer: Ling 3.1 Flash is 11x cheaper (0.021¢ vs 0.22¢ a chat). Ling 3.1 Flash ranks higher overall (#5 vs #7). Ling 3.1 Flash wins at reasoning. GPT-6 Sol wins at coding. Ling 3.1 Flash is the better all-rounder for the money, but GPT-6 Sol is worth it if you mostly need coding.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.1 FLASH
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE832 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER81AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
88
Code
66
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Math
52
Value
86
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
0.021¢ per chat · 4,846 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
OOPENAIGANG
GPT-6 SOL
OPENAI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE694 SOURCES
INTELLIGENCEPEOPLETOOLSA BRIGHTERTOMORROW.
BETTERIDEASHIGHERPEOPLE
POWER78ARENA · EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Code
81
Reasoning
84
Math
78
Agentic
73
Writing
66
Value
54
BOSS★★★★
CODER / REASONER
0.22¢ per chat · 454 chats per NZ$1
“Ship it. Then fix it.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Ling 3.1 Flash
GPT-6 Sol
Cost per chat (NZD)
0.021¢
0.22¢
Chats per NZ$1
4,846
454
Overall rank
#5
#7
Vendor
InclusionAI
OpenAI
Speciality
General
Code
Reasoning
88
84
Code
66
81
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash or GPT-6 Sol?
Ling 3.1 Flash costs 0.021¢ per typical chat versus 0.22¢ for GPT-6 Sol on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or GPT-6 Sol?
Ling 3.1 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Ling 3.1 Flash leads at reasoning; GPT-6 Sol leads at coding.
Can I try Ling 3.1 Flash and GPT-6 Sol side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
