Short answer: Ling 3.1 Flash is 38x cheaper (0.021¢ vs 0.79¢ a chat). Ling 3.1 Flash ranks higher overall (#6 vs #9). Ling 3.1 Flash wins at reasoning. Grok 4.7 wins at coding. Ling 3.1 Flash is the better all-rounder for the money, but Grok 4.7 is worth it if you mostly need coding.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.1 FLASH
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE832 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER81AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
88
Code
66
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Math
52
Value
86
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
0.021¢ per chat · 4,846 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
XXAIGANG
GROK 4.7
XAI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE533 SOURCES
REALQUESTIONS.BOLDERANSWERS.
HIGHERCEILINGS.HARDERPROBLEMS.
POWER68EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
79
Code
69
Writing
54
Math
44
Instruction
4
Value
26
BOSS★★★★
REASONER / CODER
0.79¢ per chat · 126 chats per NZ$1
“See the whole pattern.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Ling 3.1 Flash
Grok 4.7
Cost per chat (NZD)
0.021¢
0.79¢
Chats per NZ$1
4,846
126
Overall rank
#6
#9
Vendor
InclusionAI
xAI
Speciality
General
Reasoning
Reasoning
88
79
Code
66
69
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash or Grok 4.7?
Ling 3.1 Flash costs 0.021¢ per typical chat versus 0.79¢ for Grok 4.7 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Grok 4.7?
Ling 3.1 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Ling 3.1 Flash leads at reasoning; Grok 4.7 leads at coding.
Can I try Ling 3.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
