Short answer: MiMo V2.5 is about the same price (0.018¢ vs 0.021¢ a chat). Ling 3.1 Flash ranks higher overall (#6 vs #10). Ling 3.1 Flash wins at reasoning, coding. Pick MiMo V2.5 for everyday use and Ling 3.1 Flash when quality matters most.
IINCLUSIONGANG
LING 3.1 FLASH
INCLUSION GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE832 SOURCES
OPENFOREVERYONE
CHEAPBIGCONTEXT
POWER81AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
88
Code
66
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Math
52
Value
86
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / REASONER
0.021¢ per chat · 4,846 chats per NZ$1
“Cheap, quick, gone.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
XXIAOMIGANG
MIMO V2.5
XIAOMI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE722 SOURCES
MOREFORLESS
FASTCHEAPSMART
POWER67AA · CRAPGPT
Writing
90
Instruction
74
Reasoning
73
Code
62
Agentic
55
Value
82
RUNNER★★★★
GENERALIST / WRITER
0.018¢ per chat · 5,549 chats per NZ$1
“Faster than your bottleneck.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Ling 3.1 Flash
MiMo V2.5
Cost per chat (NZD)
0.021¢
0.018¢
Chats per NZ$1
4,846
5,549
Overall rank
#6
#10
Vendor
InclusionAI
Xiaomi
Speciality
General
General
Crowd Elo
no votes
1000
Reasoning
88
73
Code
66
62
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash or MiMo V2.5?
MiMo V2.5 costs 0.018¢ per typical chat versus 0.021¢ for Ling 3.1 Flash on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or MiMo V2.5?
Ling 3.1 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Ling 3.1 Flash leads at reasoning, coding.
Can I try Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo V2.5 side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
