Short answer: Laguna S 2.1 is 97x cheaper (under 0.01¢ vs 0.78¢ a chat). Laguna S 2.1 ranks higher overall (#22 vs #24). Laguna S 2.1 wins at reasoning, writing. Laguna S 2.1 is the clear pick: stronger and cheaper.
PPOOLSIDEGANG
LAGUNA S 2.1
POOLSIDE GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE671 SOURCE
CODEIN THESUN
SHIPITCHEAP
POWER53UNVERIFIED · CRAPGPT TESTS
Code
50
Reasoning
56
Instruction
54
Writing
54
Math
52
Value
94
SPECIALIST★★★
CODER / REASONER
<0.01¢ per chat · 12,529 chats per NZ$1
“Compiles first time. Mostly.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
?STEALTHGANG
SPACE BUNNY ALPHA
STEALTH GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE301 SOURCE
NONAMENOTRACE
UNKNOWNORIGIN
POWER37UNVERIFIED · CRAPGPT TESTS
Code
50
Instruction
54
Math
52
Writing
8
Reasoning
6
Value
18
BOSS★★
CODER / EXECUTOR
0.78¢ per chat · 128 chats per NZ$1
“Ship it. Then fix it.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Laguna S 2.1
Space Bunny Alpha
Cost per chat (NZD)
under 0.01¢
0.78¢
Chats per NZ$1
12,529
128
Overall rank
#22
#24
Vendor
Poolside
Stealth
Speciality
Code
Code
Reasoning
56
6
Code
50
50
Math
52
52
Writing
54
8
Instruction
54
54
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-11.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Laguna S 2.1 or Space Bunny Alpha?
Laguna S 2.1 costs under 0.01¢ per typical chat versus 0.78¢ for Space Bunny Alpha on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Laguna S 2.1 or Space Bunny Alpha?
Laguna S 2.1 ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Laguna S 2.1 leads at reasoning, writing.
Can I try Laguna S 2.1 and Space Bunny Alpha side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
