Short answer: GLM 5.3 Flash is 251x cheaper (0.052¢ vs 13.05¢ a chat). GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher overall (#16 vs #18). Fugu Ultra v2 wins at maths. GLM 5.3 Flash wins at reasoning, coding. GLM 5.3 Flash is the better all-rounder for the money, but Fugu Ultra v2 is worth it if you mostly need maths.
SSAKANAGANG
FUGU ULTRA V2
SAKANA GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE391 SOURCE
SWARMMINDADAPT
MANYMODELSONESCHOOL
POWER59UNVERIFIED · CRAPGPT TESTS
Code
50
Writing
90
Reasoning
56
Instruction
54
Math
52
Value
2
BOSS★★★
CODER / WRITER
13.0¢ per chat · 7 chats per NZ$1
“Ship it. Then fix it.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
ZZ.AIGANG
GLM 5.3 FLASH
Z.AI GANG
CRAPGPT.LOLINDEPENDENT AI MODEL REVIEWS
CRAP SCORE643 SOURCES
PRECISECALMAHEAD
REASONATSCALE
POWER61EPOCH · AA · CRAPGPT
Reasoning
67
Agentic
77
Code
65
Instruction
54
Math
37
Value
70
SPECIALIST★★★
REASONER / AGENT
0.052¢ per chat · 1,927 chats per NZ$1
“Deep thought. Low drama.”
Every model is somebody.
— CRAPGPT.LOL —
Fugu Ultra v2
GLM 5.3 Flash
Cost per chat (NZD)
13.05¢
0.052¢
Chats per NZ$1
7
1,927
Overall rank
#18
#16
Vendor
Sakana AI
Z.ai
Speciality
Code
Reasoning
Crowd Elo
no votes
1012
Reasoning
56
67
Code
50
65
Math
52
37
Scores are 0 to 100 percentiles blending LMArena, Epoch AI, Artificial Analysis and CrapGPT's own tests. Updated 2026-10-13.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Fugu Ultra v2 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash costs 0.052¢ per typical chat versus 13.05¢ for Fugu Ultra v2 on CrapGPT (NZD, measured token use).
Which is better, Fugu Ultra v2 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher overall on CrapGPT's blended benchmark score. By category: Fugu Ultra v2 leads at maths; GLM 5.3 Flash leads at reasoning, coding.
Can I try Fugu Ultra v2 and GLM 5.3 Flash side by side?
Yes. CrapGPT's card battle sends one prompt to two models and lets you pick the winner, paying only for the two replies.
